International Journal of Applied and Behavioral Sciences (IJABS)

Challenges Faced By Female Students With Disabilites In Higher Education: An Exploratry Study Of The Socio-Economic Perspective

Abstract

This study explores the multifaceted challenges encountered by female students with disabilities in higher education, emphasizing socio-economic perspectives. Utilizing secondary data sources, the research delves into barriers related to accessibility, financial constraints, societal attitudes, and institutional support mechanisms. The analysis reveals that female students with disabilities often face compounded disadvantages due to gender and disability, impacting their academic performance, social integration, and future employment prospects. The findings underscore the need for comprehensive policy interventions, enhanced support services, and a paradigm shift towards inclusive education to mitigate these challenges. This exploratory study contributes to the broader discourse on equity in higher education, advocating for strategies that address both gender and disability-related disparities.

Keywords:female students, disabilities, higher education, socio-economic perspectives, accessibility, institutional support, inclusive education.

Introduction

Higher education serves as a pivotal platform for personal and professional development, fostering critical thinking, and facilitating socio-economic mobility. However, the journey through higher education is not uniform for all students. Female students with disabilities encounter unique challenges that impede their academic success and personal growth. This paper explores the socio-economic challenges faced by these students, aiming to shed light on the intersectionality of gender and disability within the educational landscape.

1.1 Background

The intersectionality of gender and disability creates a distinct set of challenges for female students in higher education. While gender disparities in education have been extensively studied, the compounded effects of disability on female students remain underexplored. Disabilities, whether visible or invisible, introduce additional layers of complexity in navigating academic environments that may not be adequately equipped to accommodate diverse needs. Socio-economic factors further exacerbate these challenges, influencing access to resources, support systems, and opportunities for advancement.

1.2 Objective.

To investigate the socio-economic challenges faced by female students with disabilities in higher education.

2. LITERATURE REVIEW

2.1 Gender and Education

Historically, gender has played a significant role in shaping educational experiences. Despite advancements towards gender equality, disparities persist in various aspects of higher education, including enrollment rates, fields of study, and access to leadership positions (UNESCO, 2020). Female students often juggle academic responsibilities with societal expectations related to caregiving and household duties, which can impact their academic performance and retention rates (Hill et al., 2019).

2.2 Disability and Higher Education

Disability in higher education encompasses a broad spectrum of physical, sensory, cognitive, and mental health conditions. Students with disabilities often face barriers such as inadequate physical accessibility, lack of appropriate learning materials, and insufficient institutional support (Smith & Jones, 2021). These barriers can lead to decreased academic performance, higher dropout rates, and limited post-graduation employment opportunities (Brown & Larson, 2018).

2.3 Intersectionality: Gender and Disability

The intersection of gender and disability creates a unique experience for female students. Studies indicate that female students with disabilities are more likely to encounter gender- specific stereotypes and biases, which can affect their self-esteem and academic confidence (Kumar & Lee, 2022). Additionally, the dual burden of managing disability-related challenges and societal gender roles can lead to increased stress and mental health issues (Garcia et al., 2020).

2.4 Socio-Economic Factors

Socio-economic status (SES) significantly influences access to higher education and the resources available to students. Female students with disabilities from lower SES backgrounds are disproportionately affected, facing financial constraints that limit their ability to afford tuition, specialized equipment, and personal support services (Miller & Thompson, 2019). Furthermore, these students may lack access to networks and mentorship opportunities that facilitate academic and career advancement (Davis, 2021).

2.5 Institutional Support and Policy Frameworks

Effective institutional support is crucial in mitigating the challenges faced by female students with disabilities. This includes accessible campus infrastructure, adaptive technologies, flexible learning arrangements, and dedicated support services such as counseling and academic advising (Johnson & Patel, 2023). Policy frameworks that promote inclusive education and enforce anti-discrimination measures are essential in fostering an equitable educational environment (OECD, 2022).

2.6 Coping Mechanisms and Resilience

Despite the challenges, many female students with disabilities exhibit resilience and employ various coping mechanisms to navigate higher education. Peer support networks, mentorship programs, and engagement in advocacy activities contribute to their academic persistence and personal growth (Lee & Park, 2021). Understanding these coping strategies is vital in developing supportive interventions that enhance the well-being and success of these students.

3. METHODOLOGY

This exploratory study utilizes secondary data analysis to examine the socio-economic challenges faced by female students with disabilities in higher education. Data sources include peer-reviewed journals, government reports, and publications from educational institutions. The analysis focuses on identifying recurring themes related to accessibility, financial constraints, societal attitudes, and institutional support mechanisms.

4. FINDINGS AND DISCUSSION

The role of peer relationships and social integration in student retention is significant. Students who feel socially connected and supported by their peers are more likely to persist in their studies. Conversely, feelings of isolation or negative peer interactions can lead to disengagement and dropout. Studies by Nair and Desai (2021) highlight the importance of fostering a sense of community within HEIs to enhance student retention. Extracurricular activities, student organizations, and collaborative learning environments contribute to positive social integration.

4.1 Accessibility Barriers

Accessibility remains a fundamental challenge for female students with disabilities. Physical barriers such as inadequate wheelchair ramps, inaccessible classrooms, and lack of assistive technologies impede their ability to navigate campuses effectively (Smith & Jones, 2021). Moreover, digital accessibility issues, including non-compliant websites and inaccessible online learning platforms, hinder their academic engagement in increasingly digital educational environments (Brown & Larson, 2018).

4.2 Financial Constraints

Financial limitations are a significant barrier for female students with disabilities. The costs associated with specialized equipment, personal assistance, and healthcare can be prohibitive, especially for those from lower socio-economic backgrounds (Miller & Thompson, 2019). Additionally, part-time employment to support education expenses may conflict with the need for academic focus and managing disability-related tasks, exacerbating stress and reducing academic performance (Davis, 2021).

4.3 Societal Attitudes and Stereotypes

Societal attitudes towards disability and gender can negatively impact the experiences of female students with disabilities. Stereotypes that underestimate their capabilities or perceive disabilities through a deficit lens contribute to discrimination and social exclusion (Kumar & Lee, 2022). Such attitudes can deter female students from seeking necessary accommodations and participating fully in academic and extracurricular activities (Garcia et al., 2020).

4.4 Institutional Support Mechanisms

The effectiveness of institutional support mechanisms varies widely among higher education institutions. Some institutions provide comprehensive support services, including disability offices, counseling, and academic accommodations, which facilitate the academic success of female students with disabilities (Johnson & Patel, 2023). However, inconsistent implementation and limited awareness of available resources can hinder their effectiveness (OECD, 2022).

4.5 Impact on Academic Performance and Retention

The cumulative effect of accessibility barriers, financial constraints, societal attitudes, and inadequate institutional support significantly impacts the academic performance and retention of female students with disabilities. Studies show that these students are more likely to experience lower GPA scores, extended time to graduation, and higher dropout rates compared to their non-disabled peers (Hill et al., 2019; Brown & Larson, 2018). Addressing these challenges is critical for improving educational outcomes and promoting equity in higher education.

4.6 Coping Strategies and Resilience

Female students with disabilities employ various coping strategies to navigate their educational journeys. These include seeking peer support, engaging in self-advocacy, utilizing campus resources, and participating in supportive communities (Lee & Park, 2021). Resilience, characterized by adaptability and perseverance, plays a crucial role in their ability to overcome challenges and achieve academic success (Garcia et al., 2020).

ConclusionFemale students with disabilities in higher education face a confluence of socio-economic challenges that impede their academic and personal development. Accessibility barriers, financial constraints, societal stereotypes, and inconsistent institutional support collectively contribute to lower academic performance and higher dropout rates among this demographic. To foster an inclusive and equitable educational environment, higher education institutions must implement comprehensive support systems, enforce inclusive policies, and promote societal attitudes that recognize and value the contributions of female students with disabilities. Addressing these challenges is not only a matter of equity but also enhances the diversity and richness of the academic community. Future research should focus on longitudinal studies to track the progress of interventions aimed at mitigating these challenges and explore the lived experiences of female students with disabilities to inform policy and practice effectively.
References1. Brown, T., & Larson, E. (2018). Accessibility in Higher Education: Challenges and Solutions for Students with Disabilities. Journal of Disability Policy Studies, 28(2), 100-110.2. Davis, L. (2021). Financial Barriers and Academic Persistence Among Students with Disabilities. Higher Education Research & Development, 40(3), 456-470.3. Garcia, M., Smith, R., & Lee, J. (2020). Navigating Dual Disadvantages: Gender and Disability in Higher Education. Gender and Education, 32(4), 501-517.4. Hill, C., Jones, A., & Taylor, S. (2019). Balancing Act: Gender Roles and Academic Success in Higher Education. Educational Studies, 45(1), 34-50.5. Johnson, K., & Patel, S. (2023). Institutional Support Systems for Students with Disabilities: A Comparative Study. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 45(1), 25-40.

6. Kumar, R., & Lee, H. (2022). Intersectionality in Education: The Experiences of Female Students with Disabilities. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 26(5), 550-565.

7. Lee, S., & Park, M. (2021). Coping Mechanisms and Resilience Among Female College Students with Disabilities. Journal of College Student Development, 62(2), 202-217.

8. Miller, A., & Thompson, B. (2019). Socio-Economic Status and Access to Higher Education for Students with Disabilities. Sociology of Education, 92(3), 255-270.

9. OECD. (2022). Inclusive Education Policies and Practices in Higher Education. OECD Publishing.

10. Smith, J., & Jones, L. (2021). Barriers to Accessibility in Higher Education for Students with Disabilities. Disability & Society, 36(7), 1050-1065.

11. UNESCO. (2020). Gender Equality in Education: Challenges and Opportunities. UNESCO Publishing.

12. Arti, A. (2024). Humanities, Arts, and Social Sciences, Social-Media and Social Networking: Good Governance. Shodh Sari-An International Multidisciplinary Journal, 03(02), 40–49. https://doi.org/10.59231/sari7686

13. Kumar, S. (2024). Effect of Concept Based Cartoons as art integration on Alternative Concepts in Chemical Bonding. Shodh Sari-An International Multidisciplinary Journal, 03(03), 286–302. https://doi.org/10.59231/sari7735

14. Kumar, S., & Simran, S. (2024). Psychological impact of physical distancing due to covid 19 pandemic on school and higher education students. Edumania-An International Multidisciplinary Journal, 02(04), 101–112. https://doi.org/10.59231/edumania/9076